< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
Welcome, Neil. > I will defend that geeky > accounting because in > our Modern Age many people don't know how exercise > relates to food. A > lot of people seem to think 20 minutes of slow > walking can burn off a > big meal. Good point (and clearly accounting worked well for you for a while). But I think nosdiet can be similarly "educational." Limiting your caloric inputs to a limited number of discreet meals makes a big visual impact. If you're overeating, it's obvious. It's not quite as *accurate* as meticulous calorie counting, but it's good enough (and much easier). Excess accuracy is expensive. > I particularly like the No S's primitivist, Tyler > Durden approach. > People think instinct is the enemy, but that's not > totally true. Your > body has a lot of mechanisms to make you want > healthy food and > activity, if you give them half a chance. Accountants are good at what they do, but they don't come cheap. Most people can't afford to keep one on staff full time. If you can dumb the job down enough, instinct works for minimum wage. Make like Mcdonalds to beat Mcdonalds. (What an awful metaphor from someone whose last name is "Engels".) Best of luck, and looking forward to hearing more from you, Reinhard |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.