< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
--- In , navin@i... wrote: > .....Hi Navin R. :) > Now, losing weight is a totally different scenario. This is a case where doing something, even if it is less than perfect, is better than doing nothing at all. If you cut out, say, seconds, but still eat sweets, that's not perfect, but it's way better than having 3 plates at the Chinese buffet. ....I used to do that often, now we only go once in a long while, but I am astounded at my change of feelings about overeating, in general, so it's not such a free for all...it used to be total gluttony on parade (in extra large booth seating!) > Because of these two starkly different examples, that's why I always get the heebie geebies when I hear phrases like, "If it's worth doing,it's worth doing right" or "If it's worth doing, it's worth not doing right", because these blanket statements are worthless - I can find many examples that could prove either one wrong. ....You know they give shots for the heebie jeebies nowadays :) > I'd say, simply ask yourself, given a task, if doing it,but not doing it right is better than not doing it at all. For No-S, the answer to me is that doing some of it is indeed much better than not doing it at all. > Just my two cents (before taxes and inflation). > -N .....Thanks for "Navins Nightline 2 cent Editorial" :) Are you eating any chocolate cake today? LOL Peace and Love, Deb ps. are you still getting residuals for the invention of the "optigrab"? LOL |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.