< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
Dear Group In the book "Intuitive Eating" by Evelyn Tribole, she recommends going no longer than 5 hours without food. Apparently, when we eat a meal, the liver stores up the glucose for slow release into the blood, but can only do it for around that length of time. I know I just couldn't go on two meals a day, I'd be famished! Sounds like torture. Love, Brian ----Original Message Follows---- From: Reinhard Engels <beautiful_idiot@...> Reply-To: To: Subject: Re: [nosdiet] emotional eating -- Me too Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 05:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Hi Risa, I'm sorry to hear about your joint problem. As far as exercise goes, I don't know how to begin to advise you. It seems to me the psychology of emotional eating goes something like this: "Food is a reward. It's the simplest, most basic kind of reward. The good kid gets the cookie. So now I'm stressed and depressed. I feel lousy about myself. But if I give myself a reward, then I must have done something good, right? If I give myself the effect, then maybe the cause will follow." This is irrational, of course, but you can see how your subconscious might be wired to believe this. What's the trick to getting around it? I don't think mere conscious awareness will do it for most people (though it's a start). I think you need a replacement reward. If you can walk or exercise, that's best. If not, a healthy or harmless food/drink reward seems like the best alternative. I think you're on track with the carrot and lemon water. It may take some experimenting to come up with just the right reward for you. I would strongly consider 3 vs. 2 meals. I think two meals is overly ambitious and perhaps not even a good in itself. Giving yourself the full 3 means no "well I've only had 2" excuses for emotional eating. It might nip it in the bud, before it becomes a problem. Less isn't necessarily better. Consider the following quote from that Harvard article I linked to regarding the Amish: "The French explanation for why Americans are so big is simple," said Jody Adams, chef/partner of Rialto, a restaurant in Harvard Square, speaking at the Oldways conference. "We eat lots of sugar, and we eat between meals. In France, no one gets so fat as to sue the restaurant!" Indeed, the national response to our glut of comestibles is apparently to eat only one meal a day—all day long. We eat everywhere and at all times: at work, at play, and in transit. "Japanese cars—the ones sold in Japan—don't have drink holders," New York Times health columnist Jane Brody said at the Oldways conference. "The Japanese don't eat and drink in their cars." http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/050465.html Best of luck, and keep bugging us if you're having trouble, Reinhard --- lupa <lupa@...> wrote: > um > *embarrassed face* > actually, walking is part of the problem. > > i've been trying to get steady exercise but i have a > serious structural problem with most of my joints - > hips being the worst. therefore, any kind of > physical activity can cause shooting pains (meaning > i don't know when or where or how it'll happen, but > when it does happen it's bad), and if the intensity > of the shooting pains is high enough it causes a > corresponding intense emotional trigger that can > last for hours, subsequently causing grinding of > teeth yadda yadda. the joint problem/pain is its > own thing i've been going to multiple drs and > allopaths for several years now to fix; it's the > emotional response i'm trying to damp down, since > that lasts so much longer than the pain does. > physical therapy exercises aren't too intensive, so > i need *something* to help. > > i've been trying the carrots option offered here - > it helps a little. i'm also trying to drink a lot > more water. i sometimes put lime or lemon juice in > it. i'm also buying mass amt's of pickles, since > they have a minimal calorie load. debating going to > three meals, at 12:45 / 6 / random needed pm time > instead of my original 12:30 / 8:30 plan. > > still working on it - was sort of hoping someone had > a better idea than i'd had ;) > > ~risa > > > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > On 5/20/2004 at 6:53 AM Reinhard Engels wrote: > > >Emotional eating (eating because you're stressed or > >depressed) is a little like emotional marksmanship > -- > >not a good idea. Try this instead: emotional > exercise. > >Nothing fancy, necessarily, just a little walk will > >do. Doesn't have to be a safari, around the block a > >few times is sufficient. Don't groan and ignore me > >just yet. Consider: > > > >1) how the eating just makes you more depressed and > >stressed (and fat). > > > >2) how a little walk does the opposite. And this > isn't > >the only benefit: you have leisure to *think* about > >whatever is stressing or depressing you. Because > >walking irrationally makes you happy (both because > of > >the sense that you are moving towards a destination > >and because of the endorphins or whatever) you are > >more likely to find a solution or pep yourself up > than > >you would be with mere stationary thinking. > > > >Don't plead lack of time. Just get yourself out of > the > >house. As for how long your walk should be, make > that > >decision once your feet are in motion. You're in no > >condition to think properly, even about as little a > >thing as this, cooped up inside next to the > >refrigerator. > > > >Reinhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.