< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:01:32PM +0100, Alison PB <alisonpb@...> wrote: > > As for danger? Well, there seems to be a lot of research into the > diets of the Inouit, the Masaai and other such groups who survive > (indeed, thrive!) on very low carbohydrate diets that only supports a > lot of the current thinking regarding cholesterol levels etc. I would recommend avoiding an Inuit diet if one's goal is to lose weight, though. The Inuit physiology has developed for warmth and survival, not for urban standards of attractiveness. (There's also an important difference between eating barbecued cuts from the butcher and eating raw cuts from the whale; just like you can't substitute iceberg lettuce for spinach and expect to get the same nutrients, you can't substitute steaks for the blubber and skin of a whale. Me, I can hardly handle deep-fried cod cheeks, let alone using up everything that comes in a fish.) Also, Uncle Cecil weighs in: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/010119.html Of course the point of No S is that you don't have to worry about adopting some sort of unusual choice of food; without faith in the grounding principle of moderation and exercise there isn't much to see here. -Rich -- Rich Lafferty --------------+----------------------------------------------- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada | Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus! http://www.lafferty.ca/ | http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus.html rich@... -----------+----------------------------------------------- |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.