< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
That sounds like a good idea Hana. I usually use a smaller plate too. I am off to a party tonight and will try not to snack. Hard to sit as I do not smoke, can't drink I am driving and I do not know very many people. -------Original Message------- From: Date: 07/10/04 09:18:42 To: Subject: Re: [nosdiet] Re:NoDiet again, Many Welcomes (some back) Portion size seems to be a useful key. I saw something on a TV programme once, which showed a plate with a design inside the central part and another on the rim.The idea was "you may cover the central pattern with food, but not the rim." I personally have plain white plates, but keep my portions of everything except steamed veggies to the centre of the plate and it's working for me. Hana ----- Original Message ----- From: "sophistliberale" <sophistliberale@...> To: <> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 2:44 AM Subject: [nosdiet] Re:NoDiet again, Many Welcomes (some back) > Wow, thanks for all the responses guys! True, sometimes I tend to > get a bit impatient (hehe). Anyway, as for the warrior diet question > and why I like the philosophy: > > Basically, a few reasons > > 1. The ultimate aim is to limit total daily caloric intake to 1 > sitting. And for someone like me, who can be "good" all day if he > knows a good dinner is on the way, that is a godsend. > > 2. I live at home with my family, and coming home, a good Indian > dinner is always ready (and is pretty nutritious) so I don't have to > worry bout constantly eating the wrong kind of food on this diet. > > 3. I enjoyed feeling light on my feet and not having an excuse to be > lazy (the approach of mealtime sometimes tends to do that to me) > throughout the day since I work at an Investment Bank. > > HOWEVER, there are a few reasons why I chose the NoSdiet instead: > > 1. I am not what you call a consistent person in much of anything. I > have the all or nothing mentality. Thankfully, up until now, > the "all" phases in my life have balanced the "nothing" phases in my > life in terms of fitness and gotten me to 170 lbs. But I know I could > have already reached my goals if I had not been so extreme. The > warrior diet, I fear, might just enhance my extreme nature towards > diet and I don't want that. I want to be able to adhere to a plan > centered on moderation with some rules, like the NoSdiet. Then, when > I am ready, mebbe I can switch to the Warrior diet. > > 2. I fear the physiological effects of the WD. I think that people > who are overweight are more sensitive to storing extra calories > ingested in one meal as fat then slim people. To that end, I think > the WD would be better as a maintenance type of diet once you reach > the weight you want. > > > > Reinhard, > > The main problem I have with "maybe" overeating is that in my case, > it's not so obvious. The problem is mostly centered around dinner. > That is where the "no seconds" part is harder for me. The type of > food I eat is vegetarian and not too fatty, so the calories are less. > The problem is that I can't not have seconds unless I absolutely cram > my plate with food the first time! However, it's slowly getting > easier to guage how much I need so that the next day, I am not > starving but not stuffed either. I am also working out daily so that > tempers this problem a bit until I get a handle on it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To visit your group on the web, go to: To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.