< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
Hey Sharon, I just wanted you to know, t-tapp CAN cause lots of inch loss, but keeping form is hard hard HARD!!!! I TOTALLY understand your frustration! I did initially lose lots of inches about 2 years ago with t-tapp, then I got pg and that was that : ) But when I lost my inches, I ended up doing a 14 day boot camp and then going to the every other day, and lost something like 24 inches in a few months. I don't think my form was perfect at all, either, being a newbie to the program. It was after that initial loss that things started to slow to a crawl, and it was then that I attended a clinic and was told my form was way off... but it worked for me initially(?). As far as the measurements go, when I started t-tapp I only did measurements of one arm, one calf, mid-thigh, hips, belly, and bust, and I still lost a total of 24", so I have no idea how much more I actually lost total according to t-tapp measuring. Anyway, I am doing the Basic Plus workout for the book contest along with no-s, so we will see where I am in 2 months. I don't honestly have the time or energy to do the full workout right now, so we will see how effective the first 15 minutes is. Beth --- In , "Sharon Wilkins" <skwilkins@v...> wrote: > > Deb, > > > > I found out about this diet from the T-Tapp website too, and have been > "tapping" off and on for 4 years. It's good for strengthening the core > muscles in the torso, and the ab workout is great, but I think it's a little > over sold on the web site - not to mention the expense of the tapes. > > > > Maybe all fitness web sites do this, but when they say someone lost X number > of inches, I tend to think of that as a combo of waist, hips, thighs, chest > & arms. What they actually do is make several measurements up your arms, > legs and torso and then combine all the "lost inches" from way more spots > than any normal person would consider measuring. Like I said, maybe it's > commonly done, but it seems a little dishonest to me. > > > > The other thing is the mega-extreme emphasis on form. Your starting > position (before you do any of the exercises) is this: > > > > 1. Legs hip width apart > 2. Knees bent > 3. Knees twisted out (from the hip) so they are over your little toes > 4. Butt tucked under - way under > 5. Abdominals tight > 6. Shoulders back and down (not pushed down with your traps, but pulled > down and together with your lats) > 7. Chest out > 8. Arms relaxed by your sides with palms forward. > > > > After that it gets complicated, and any failure to lose has the trainers > immediately attributing it to your not having done one of the above > perfectly. > > > > I've found that it's great for improving balance, and I use it for that, but > for fat burning, nothing beats the old treadmill/exercise bike combo for me. > > > > Sharon > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: oldiesrbest [mailto:oldiesrbest@y...] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 4:08 PM > To: > Subject: [nosdiet] Re: Allow myself to introduce...myself... > > > > > > Hi Deb, > If T-Tapp (Teresa Tapp) is done correctly, I don't think that you > would ever "Out Grow" the benefits of this exercise program. Teresa > has a very long list of credentials and a lot of work in the progress > of this program. Is it for everyone, probably not, worth > investigating, it's up to the individual. Take a look, it's a lot > harder than one might think at first glance, and about the time you > think you've got it, it gets harder. Nothing against your trainer, > but that's usually the response from someone that hasn't tried it. > Okay, so back to the NoS subect, how long have you been on this WOE > and what type of results have you had. > I noticed last night that after preparing heaping plate and couldn't > finish the whole thing, maybe there's hope for me. I haven't felt > guilty about anything that I've eaten either. Yea. > Bye for now. > Joyce > > > > --- In , "Debbie Feder" <deborahfederlmt@h...> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In , "oldiesrbest" <oldiesrbest@y...> > > wrote: > > > It's difficult to explain, but the exercises are designed to > > fatigue each muscle group without weights by using isometric > > movements. > > ....Hi Oldies :) > > I will check out your TTap site... From what I understand, > according > > to my muscle bound personal trainer who is definitely a very big > guy, > > isometric movements won't do much for the muscles because you have > > to work the muscle to the full extent of its range of motion...yes > > you will develop some endurance and burn some calories to be sure, > > but to really see results and improve your muscles you have to do, > > what he called, "progressive overload"... ie, if you don't continue > > to challenge the muscle, your results won't be optimal. > > But do what you like, because that is a very important factor, and > > it is usually the deciding factor on whether or not you continue > any > > exercise regimen :) > > Hope NoS is going well for you > > Deb > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > <mailto:?subject=Unsubscribe> > > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.