< previous message | next message >
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
There have been a bunch of posts on these two subjects recently and I think they're not entirely unrelated. While there is no reason you *couldn't* do nos plus some other system, I think "going multiple" can be a recipe for disaster if your primary motivation is failure to stick with plain old no-s. Here's why: 1) If you can't even stick with one simple system, what makes you think you're going to be able to handle 2? Making things *more* complicated is the opposite of what you should be doing. The same holds for those who want to "de-S" weekend days for more rapid progress or to make up for weekday lapses. It's crazy to jump to "hard" when "easy" is too much for you. Master easy first; I think you'll find, as I did, that easy is enough. Yes, it takes time, but it gets easier with time, which is exactly what you want. 2) Giving yourself a "backup" system can encourage failure. You might think, "well, this isn't so bad if it just happens once in a while and the backup actually does catch me." But the primary issue is you'll be confused as to what is going on. The greatest of all dietary dangers, not sugar, not carbs, not fat, but self-deception has room to maneuver. You'll also be inclined to use one system to take revenge on yourself for lapses in the other. I know there are a bunch of people on the list who are happily doing multiple systems and that's great. Please don't take this as a criticism or discouragement. But I also know that there are a bunch who just need to buckle down and focus on the basics. Reinhard |
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.