< previous message | next message >
|
Note: This is an archived message from our old discussion software. Join the current discussion here.
--- In , "us4savells" <knk.savell@c...> wrote:
> Right - Starbucks..... the fat and caloric intake of a Starbucks
or Panera non fat cafe mocha is not bad.... It's 170 calories - only
5 from fat.... A cafe latte non fat is 120 calories and 0 fat
calories.... This of course is without whipped cream! :c)
So - that's not so awful, is it??
Kirstie :) That last question seems more rhetorical than asking for
an opinion... I used to work at Starbucks for about 3 months while I
was in school. The "Mocha" version of anything should be considered
an "S" for NoS purposes... Basically all it is, is a fancier name
for coffee with chocolate syrup.. And, depending on how many pumps
of syrup, you could be adding 150 calories at one shot, of plain old
sugar...The regular latte wouldn't be off limits during the week
since it's not sugarfied.
I believe what Reinhard was referring to, in that last post, are the
"Coffee" drinks that aren't really coffee. Frappucinos, and
whatever Dunkin Donuts version is called, oh yeah Coolattas, are
really just as bad as going to Carvel or Baskin and Robbins and
ordering a medium ice cream shake..Trust me, I used to make these
drinks, and they are very very syrupy with just a little coffee
flavoring added. But they are okay on S days as a special treat to
look forward to.
PS. If you love whipped cream so much, here's a task that's both
decadent and exercise related.
Get a stainless steel bowl, a whisk and a little pure vanilla
extract and make a nice batch of homemade whipped cream- sans sugar.
Your arms will be crying "uncle" by the time it's done and you will
have had a mini workout to earn your rich reward! :)
(no cheating with an electric hand mixer!)
Have a nice weekend :)
Peace,
Deb
|
© 2002-2005 Reinhard Engels, All Rights Reserved.